June 29, 2010
"Greece Lightning"
No, the title of this post is not original - in fact, I borrowed it from the referring article. But check out this photo, copyrighted by the Associated Press. It got a link on Drudge today. Click to see a full size version at the Daily Mail.
Labels:
Just for Fun
June 24, 2010
The President's Right Decisions
While I have tried to be measured in what I post to this blog when talking about the current administration, I admit it is rare to find me in agreement with the direction and decisions made by the President during the past year and a half. However, I will most certainly give credit when it is due, and in the case of the war effort in Afghanistan, the President did the right thing yesterday, two times over. In brief, Gen. Stanley McChrystal took responsibility for what appears to be disparaging and possibly contemptuous comments made by his staff about various figures within the civilian leadership and administration, all published in Rolling Stone. (Disclosure: I have not read the article in its entirety). Gen. McChrystal offered his resignation to the President, who rightly accepted it. Then the President asked Gen. David Petraeus to accept what would rightly be viewed as a demotion from U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) to return to the field in service to his country.
Whatever one thinks of the current Afghan strategy (and note that I am skeptical that a country that has never known true organized institutions of government can possibly establish them in a mere decade), and whatever feelings one may have about unwieldy rules of engagement (over which I also have heartburn), the bottom line is this: there is absolutely no place for a general officer in a theater of operation to publicly denigrate his civilian leadership, or to allow such opinions to be expressed in the presence of junior officers, enlisted or civilians. To allegedly allow such an atmosphere of disdain to promulgate through his staff is unbecoming. Don't get me wrong - everything I've read about Gen. McChrystal seems to suggest that he is the type of general we need to help fight our wars. I do not disparage his knowledge, or his service. But this situation with the Rolling Stone article is untenable.
At the very least, Gen. McChrystal took the honorable course and offered his resignation. Without doubt, he was, and is free to hold whatever private views he has. The failure of judgment, intentional or not, reflected badly on the both the President and the military command. It nearly created a terrible mess that implicated all - with a very direct impact on those warfighters putting their lives on the line for us. They deserve better.
The President had a choice as well. He could have chosen not to accept the resignation, instead issuing a reprimand and then sending the general back to theater. I submit to do so would have been a sign of weakness that would have had a terrible effect on morale and discipline. Anything less than relieving the general of his command would have ultimately undermined confidence in the authority of the Commander-in-Chief among the ranks of our fighting men and women. Old-fashioned as it may be, honor still matters. Failure to punish such alleged contempt will do nothing but erode morale - already pushed to the limits due to what appears to be an indecisive, ineffective strategy with unworkable rules of engagement. But accepting the resignation, which the President did, could have easily left the entire operational strategy in shambles. Enter Gen. David Petraeus, who oversaw the successful Iraq surge strategy and operation in 2007-2008. Gen. Petraeus, who is neither superman nor savior, may very well be the only general with sufficient bona fides to stabilize, rescue and rework the Afghan strategy, at least in the eyes of the fighting men and women. That is both my speculation, and my hope. It is absolutely critical that the warfighter believe in himself, his friends and his leadership.
There may be a disadvantage, however. The move is militarily a demotion and a sacrifice of sorts for Gen. Petraeus, but one he appears to have willingly accepted. He will move from the command of U.S. CENTCOM (based in Tampa), responsible for overseeing military activities across the Middle East and Asia. Stepping down to lead the war effort in Afghanistan means he won't be directly in on the strategic challenges posed by an ever belligerent Iran.
But as the President said, "War is bigger than any one man or woman, whether a private, a general or a president." We face an uncertain future - we always have. But time and again, men and women of valor have risen to the occasion. Sometimes there is defeat, but at least in our history, often there is victory.
May that victory come soonest, that there may be peace.
Whatever one thinks of the current Afghan strategy (and note that I am skeptical that a country that has never known true organized institutions of government can possibly establish them in a mere decade), and whatever feelings one may have about unwieldy rules of engagement (over which I also have heartburn), the bottom line is this: there is absolutely no place for a general officer in a theater of operation to publicly denigrate his civilian leadership, or to allow such opinions to be expressed in the presence of junior officers, enlisted or civilians. To allegedly allow such an atmosphere of disdain to promulgate through his staff is unbecoming. Don't get me wrong - everything I've read about Gen. McChrystal seems to suggest that he is the type of general we need to help fight our wars. I do not disparage his knowledge, or his service. But this situation with the Rolling Stone article is untenable.
At the very least, Gen. McChrystal took the honorable course and offered his resignation. Without doubt, he was, and is free to hold whatever private views he has. The failure of judgment, intentional or not, reflected badly on the both the President and the military command. It nearly created a terrible mess that implicated all - with a very direct impact on those warfighters putting their lives on the line for us. They deserve better.
The President had a choice as well. He could have chosen not to accept the resignation, instead issuing a reprimand and then sending the general back to theater. I submit to do so would have been a sign of weakness that would have had a terrible effect on morale and discipline. Anything less than relieving the general of his command would have ultimately undermined confidence in the authority of the Commander-in-Chief among the ranks of our fighting men and women. Old-fashioned as it may be, honor still matters. Failure to punish such alleged contempt will do nothing but erode morale - already pushed to the limits due to what appears to be an indecisive, ineffective strategy with unworkable rules of engagement. But accepting the resignation, which the President did, could have easily left the entire operational strategy in shambles. Enter Gen. David Petraeus, who oversaw the successful Iraq surge strategy and operation in 2007-2008. Gen. Petraeus, who is neither superman nor savior, may very well be the only general with sufficient bona fides to stabilize, rescue and rework the Afghan strategy, at least in the eyes of the fighting men and women. That is both my speculation, and my hope. It is absolutely critical that the warfighter believe in himself, his friends and his leadership.
There may be a disadvantage, however. The move is militarily a demotion and a sacrifice of sorts for Gen. Petraeus, but one he appears to have willingly accepted. He will move from the command of U.S. CENTCOM (based in Tampa), responsible for overseeing military activities across the Middle East and Asia. Stepping down to lead the war effort in Afghanistan means he won't be directly in on the strategic challenges posed by an ever belligerent Iran.
But as the President said, "War is bigger than any one man or woman, whether a private, a general or a president." We face an uncertain future - we always have. But time and again, men and women of valor have risen to the occasion. Sometimes there is defeat, but at least in our history, often there is victory.
May that victory come soonest, that there may be peace.
Labels:
History and Politics
June 22, 2010
Taking Chance
Last night, I sat down to watch Taking Chance, the 2009 HBO film starring Kevin Bacon as Lt. Colonel Mike Strobl, a Marine officer who volunteered to escort fallen Marine Lance Corporal Chance Russell Phelps to his family and final resting place. The movie trailer gives you but a taste:
Watching this movie is an intensely personal experience, and one that I would highly recommend. I'd even go so far as to suggest watching it privately, to allow yourself to experience the emotion without inhibition. Several of the scenes struck very close to home, too close, as if they were ripped right out of my memory.
The experience was a reminder for me, about why I do what I do. For as remote and indirect as my work may be, what I do is for the ultimate benefit and safety of those who serve on the front lines of freedom. The warfighter deserves my best effort, no matter how minor my role may be. May God bless and protect them all.
In the solitude of my viewing experience, I knew I would not be strong enough to hold back the tears. Yet as I reflect further, though, I realize I was mistaken.
For I am strong enough - strong enough not to hold back the tears. Strong enough to not even try.
Watching this movie is an intensely personal experience, and one that I would highly recommend. I'd even go so far as to suggest watching it privately, to allow yourself to experience the emotion without inhibition. Several of the scenes struck very close to home, too close, as if they were ripped right out of my memory.
The experience was a reminder for me, about why I do what I do. For as remote and indirect as my work may be, what I do is for the ultimate benefit and safety of those who serve on the front lines of freedom. The warfighter deserves my best effort, no matter how minor my role may be. May God bless and protect them all.
In the solitude of my viewing experience, I knew I would not be strong enough to hold back the tears. Yet as I reflect further, though, I realize I was mistaken.
For I am strong enough - strong enough not to hold back the tears. Strong enough to not even try.
Labels:
Contemplative
June 21, 2010
Clue #1
Something tells me that I may need to clean out my gutters ...
When you leave things unattended for too long, things grow where clearly they should not.
When you leave things unattended for too long, things grow where clearly they should not.
Labels:
Just for Fun
June 20, 2010
Father's Day
As I sat in my chair this morning, enjoying my coffee with homemade expressions of love from my family by my side, I read a wonderful post on the topics of honor and fatherhood. If you are a dad, I recommend it to you as required reading. Some excerpts:
Happy Father's Day to all.
A good father reveals the nature of honor to his sons and daughters through his conduct. He is loyal to his wife and children, despite the easy temptations offered by the modern world. He works to build a better future for them, rather than waiting for it to be dropped in his lap, or demanding others provide it for him. He rejoices in this task, and his joy is so obvious that his family forgives his occasional moments of weariness or frustration. Through marriage, he has chosen duty over indulgence. He sees the intricate beauty of permanence, when the flickering neon light of passing fancy is more obvious. Honor is one of the many frequencies of love. ...Read the whole thing. I can only hope that despite my imperfection and all too frequent failures in parenting, that my sons inherit some portion of this idea of honor - indeed one of the many frequencies of love.
The honor we inherit from our fathers makes us adventurers, explorers, architects, and paladins. Without it, too many people become predatory, or sessile. Either way, those people are clay to be molded by the will of others. When we act in the name of our fathers, we bear the strength of history. Deprived of this strength, many are trapped forever in the present moment, with past and future beyond their reach. A good father teaches us that the past and future come as a set.
Happy Father's Day to all.
Labels:
Contemplative
June 18, 2010
Ranking Pixar
Toy Story 3 is opening this weekend in movie theaters. While going to see the latest Pixar feature is certainly on the to-do list, I believe I can wait until the second or third wave of movie-goers pass by. In the meantime however, ew.com decided to celebrate this 11th film from the studio that saved Disney animated family fare by ranking the first ten. Their list, in reverse order:
1. The Incredibles
First of all, this movie features a fantastic soundtrack by Michael Giacchino. Besides the homage to the comic book & superhero genre, The Incredibles suggests that gifts and talents should not be suppressed for the sake of fitting in to whatever is normal. Rather, the uniqueness of gifting and talent should be cultivated for the good of others. Did I mention I love the soundtrack? Moderately quotable too. "We'll get there when we get there!" "What are you waiting for? ... Something amazing I guess." "That was totally wicked!"
2. Up
This one had to grow on me; at first I wasn't really sure how I felt about it. Over time however, I have come to deeply appreciate this story. I love the story of a love that doesn't end even when one passes away, but even more, I appreciate the insistence that as long as we live and breathe, we can continue to be an influence and make a difference in the lives of others - and in that journey, rediscover a joy and purpose in living no matter what our age. I can only hope and pray that I never stop living purposefully and productively. "Squirrel!"
3. Finding Nemo
I love this movie both for its story and the animation. I remember just being stunned at the ocean-life imagery on the big screen. Great combination of drama and comedy just makes this a fully enjoyable experience. I often go around quoting Crush, the great sea turtle, to the immense annoyance of my children. "Mr. Turtle is my fa-ther!" "Pschaw!" "To-tally!" "You made me ink!"
4. Toy Story
Classic movie, always enjoyable, and always quotable. The best part of the Toy Story movies is the all-star casting of voices. "You are a child's .. Plaything!" "Too infinity … " (you can finish the rest).
5. WALL-E
When I first saw this movie in the theater, I remember being fully enamored by the visual spacescapes. I confess though, I was somewhat put off by the environmentalist themes, although I get the fact that it was more of a prop than a preaching. The bigger statement, however, was illustrated in a society so beholden to online community that they nearly lost all sense of their humanity, until a sequence of events led to a simple human touch that in turn led to an awakening of sorts. A warning perhaps? Only quote that matters: "Waaa-llll-eeeeee."
At this point, I'll make note that while the order is different, my top 5 and that of ew.com contains the same movies. Hmm.
6. Monsters, Inc.
I love this movie for the gag comedy. It's just a great laugh, thanks to the efforts of Billy Crystal. "Put that thing back where it came from, or so help me, (BOM-bom-Bom-bom) …" "Mike Wazowski!" "I'm watching … always watching …"
7. Toy Story 2
I'm not a big fan of sequels in the Disney-verse. I thought Toy Story should have stood on its own. I did enjoy Toy Story 2, complete with the Star Wars spoofing. And again, great voice casting - especially Kelsey Grammer, Wayne Knight, and Wallace Shawn. "Buzz, Buzz! My backend's going to Baton Rouge!" "I'm Buzz Lightyear. No, I'm Buzz Lightyear!"
8. Ratatouille
In time, this one will move up the list. I do find myself enjoying it more each time I watch it. "Don't just hork it down!" is a favorite quote around our dinner table.
9. Cars
It may seem odd that I put this one down at number 9, but the reality is that numbers 6-9 are all pretty close. I enjoy them all. I did pass through a bit of Cars fatigue though, perhaps due to the over-marketing and the repetition (it was my boys' favorite for a while). Mater is most definitely one of the most enjoyable sidekicks around. "I don't need to know where I'm going, I just need to know where I've been." "Whoo-eee! I'm happier than a tornado in a trailer park!" "She just loves me for my bo-dy."
10. A Bug's Life
This one is my least favorite. I just never really could identify with it, and I probably won't bother to watch it again. "Ladies and gentlebugs! Larvae of all stages! Rub your legs together for the world's greatest bug circus!"
Well, there's my ranking. No doubt, Pixar makes great films. I can only hope that the other planned sequels for Cars and Monsters, Inc. are decent. I'm nervous that the rash of sequels is driven in part because of a dearth of new ideas. They certainly have set the bar high for themselves.
See you at the movies!
10. A Bug's LifeEveryone is entitled to their opinion of course, so allow me to share mine. Granted, the number one Disney animated feature of all time is The Jungle Book, which of course will never be surpassed. Nevertheless, Pixar rejuvenated the Disney movie brand, and so here is my ranking, top to bottom:
9. Monsters, Inc.
8. Ratatouille
7. Toy Story 2
6. Cars
5. Up
4. Finding Nemo
3. WALL-E
2. The Incredibles
1. Toy Story
1. The Incredibles
First of all, this movie features a fantastic soundtrack by Michael Giacchino. Besides the homage to the comic book & superhero genre, The Incredibles suggests that gifts and talents should not be suppressed for the sake of fitting in to whatever is normal. Rather, the uniqueness of gifting and talent should be cultivated for the good of others. Did I mention I love the soundtrack? Moderately quotable too. "We'll get there when we get there!" "What are you waiting for? ... Something amazing I guess." "That was totally wicked!"
2. Up
This one had to grow on me; at first I wasn't really sure how I felt about it. Over time however, I have come to deeply appreciate this story. I love the story of a love that doesn't end even when one passes away, but even more, I appreciate the insistence that as long as we live and breathe, we can continue to be an influence and make a difference in the lives of others - and in that journey, rediscover a joy and purpose in living no matter what our age. I can only hope and pray that I never stop living purposefully and productively. "Squirrel!"
3. Finding Nemo
I love this movie both for its story and the animation. I remember just being stunned at the ocean-life imagery on the big screen. Great combination of drama and comedy just makes this a fully enjoyable experience. I often go around quoting Crush, the great sea turtle, to the immense annoyance of my children. "Mr. Turtle is my fa-ther!" "Pschaw!" "To-tally!" "You made me ink!"
4. Toy Story
Classic movie, always enjoyable, and always quotable. The best part of the Toy Story movies is the all-star casting of voices. "You are a child's .. Plaything!" "Too infinity … " (you can finish the rest).
5. WALL-E
When I first saw this movie in the theater, I remember being fully enamored by the visual spacescapes. I confess though, I was somewhat put off by the environmentalist themes, although I get the fact that it was more of a prop than a preaching. The bigger statement, however, was illustrated in a society so beholden to online community that they nearly lost all sense of their humanity, until a sequence of events led to a simple human touch that in turn led to an awakening of sorts. A warning perhaps? Only quote that matters: "Waaa-llll-eeeeee."
At this point, I'll make note that while the order is different, my top 5 and that of ew.com contains the same movies. Hmm.
6. Monsters, Inc.
I love this movie for the gag comedy. It's just a great laugh, thanks to the efforts of Billy Crystal. "Put that thing back where it came from, or so help me, (BOM-bom-Bom-bom) …" "Mike Wazowski!" "I'm watching … always watching …"
7. Toy Story 2
I'm not a big fan of sequels in the Disney-verse. I thought Toy Story should have stood on its own. I did enjoy Toy Story 2, complete with the Star Wars spoofing. And again, great voice casting - especially Kelsey Grammer, Wayne Knight, and Wallace Shawn. "Buzz, Buzz! My backend's going to Baton Rouge!" "I'm Buzz Lightyear. No, I'm Buzz Lightyear!"
8. Ratatouille
In time, this one will move up the list. I do find myself enjoying it more each time I watch it. "Don't just hork it down!" is a favorite quote around our dinner table.
9. Cars
It may seem odd that I put this one down at number 9, but the reality is that numbers 6-9 are all pretty close. I enjoy them all. I did pass through a bit of Cars fatigue though, perhaps due to the over-marketing and the repetition (it was my boys' favorite for a while). Mater is most definitely one of the most enjoyable sidekicks around. "I don't need to know where I'm going, I just need to know where I've been." "Whoo-eee! I'm happier than a tornado in a trailer park!" "She just loves me for my bo-dy."
10. A Bug's Life
This one is my least favorite. I just never really could identify with it, and I probably won't bother to watch it again. "Ladies and gentlebugs! Larvae of all stages! Rub your legs together for the world's greatest bug circus!"
Well, there's my ranking. No doubt, Pixar makes great films. I can only hope that the other planned sequels for Cars and Monsters, Inc. are decent. I'm nervous that the rash of sequels is driven in part because of a dearth of new ideas. They certainly have set the bar high for themselves.
See you at the movies!
Labels:
Just for Fun
June 14, 2010
Watchman at The Gap
In many ways, I live an introspective life. By this, I mean that my mind never, ever ceases. I am always thinking, wondering, puzzling - and yes, worrying. I wonder about the nature of things, the behavior of societies, the motives of the heart; I am always, always observing. And it frequently exhausts me.
I find this to be both blessing and curse. The blessing comes in those moments of insight and revelation from above that fill me with hope and glimpses of understanding. The curse comes in those moments when the inner vortex temporarily blocks the light, resulting in paralytic depression. To say that I have a tendency to over-analyze everything would be an understatement. I am constantly seeking that framework, that context that provides order and meaning to the way things work, the way people are, the purpose for which we live. Such matters are inseparable from faith, because so much of individual and collective behavior is linked to a corresponding belief system, regardless of its definition. Actions (or inactions) are always driven by motive compelled by belief (for even "lack of belief" is a rooted belief system). Some of these are good, some are not - although they can be difficult to judge apart from some moral standard.
I listened to a sermon podcast this morning that reminded me that actions of kindness, mercy and grace - particularly offered to the stranger who is yet our neighbor - are merely the fruit of a relationship with Jesus Christ. It is not the actions themselves which enable salvation ("not by works") - but the relationship that transforms and empowers and stimulates us to service. "But someone will say, 'You have faith; I have deeds.' Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do." (James 2:18)
As I pondered this reminder, I was further touched by a story that seems to be making the rounds in various international papers this weekend. It is the story of an 84 year old man, Don Ritchie, who over the past 50 years has personally intervened and prevented scores of suicide attempts at a cliff known as the Gap near Sydney, Australia. I urge you to read for yourself the accounts from the Sydney Morning Herald and the Independent. In the latter, I found myself profoundly moved by this excerpt (emphasis mine):
It's all very simple, you see. Believer, you can't just sit there and watch. "You gotta try."
(h/t: Lori Ziganto)
I find this to be both blessing and curse. The blessing comes in those moments of insight and revelation from above that fill me with hope and glimpses of understanding. The curse comes in those moments when the inner vortex temporarily blocks the light, resulting in paralytic depression. To say that I have a tendency to over-analyze everything would be an understatement. I am constantly seeking that framework, that context that provides order and meaning to the way things work, the way people are, the purpose for which we live. Such matters are inseparable from faith, because so much of individual and collective behavior is linked to a corresponding belief system, regardless of its definition. Actions (or inactions) are always driven by motive compelled by belief (for even "lack of belief" is a rooted belief system). Some of these are good, some are not - although they can be difficult to judge apart from some moral standard.
I listened to a sermon podcast this morning that reminded me that actions of kindness, mercy and grace - particularly offered to the stranger who is yet our neighbor - are merely the fruit of a relationship with Jesus Christ. It is not the actions themselves which enable salvation ("not by works") - but the relationship that transforms and empowers and stimulates us to service. "But someone will say, 'You have faith; I have deeds.' Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do." (James 2:18)
As I pondered this reminder, I was further touched by a story that seems to be making the rounds in various international papers this weekend. It is the story of an 84 year old man, Don Ritchie, who over the past 50 years has personally intervened and prevented scores of suicide attempts at a cliff known as the Gap near Sydney, Australia. I urge you to read for yourself the accounts from the Sydney Morning Herald and the Independent. In the latter, I found myself profoundly moved by this excerpt (emphasis mine):
Lost souls who stood atop the cliff, wondering whether to jump, say their salvation was a soft voice breaking the sound of the wind and the waves, asking: "Why don't you come and have a cup of tea?"How easy it is for us to become completely self-absorbed with our own struggles, fears, and preoccupations. We allow that inner vortex to block the light and in so doing, become convinced that we alone are suffering. Sometimes we feel like the one standing at the edge, wanting someone to come to our aid and getting frustrated when they don't. Yet we are not alone, and there is a voice calling, pleading, saying: Just turn around, step away from the edge, and walk in a new direction toward what you know is true. The believer is called to look outward, not just inward. To look upward, not just downward. To see that which is right before us - opportunities to be that soft voice, that friend, that intercessor that stands in the gap to prevent any more lost souls from leaping off the cliff into despair, disillusionment, depression and destruction.
And when they turned to the stranger, they say his smile made them want to live.
Mr. Ritchie, who lives across the street from The Gap, is widely regarded as a guardian angel who has shepherded countless people away from the edge.
What some consider grim, Mr. Ritchie considers a gift.
"You can't just sit there and watch them," he said, perched on his beloved green leather chair, from which he keeps a watchful eye on the cliff outside.
"You gotta try and save them. It's pretty simple."
It's all very simple, you see. Believer, you can't just sit there and watch. "You gotta try."
(h/t: Lori Ziganto)
Labels:
Contemplative,
Ministry and Theology
Iranian Ships Headed for Gaza
I promise, I will blog about other topics this month. But this will bear watching over the next week. Potential for fireworks: 60%.
Iran is sending aid ships to blockaded Gaza, state radio said on Monday -- a move likely to be considered provocative by Israel which accuses Tehran of arming the Palestinian enclave's Islamist rulers, Hamas.For now, it appears that the Iranian Republican Guard is staying on the sidelines, despite some preliminary noise to the contrary. It's going to be a long, hot summer.
One ship left port on Sunday and another will depart by Friday, loaded with food, construction material and toys, the report said. The boats would be part of international efforts to break Israel's isolation of the Gaza Strip.
"Until the end of the Gaza blockade, Iran will continue to ship aid," said an official at Iran's Society for the Defence of the Palestinian Nation.
Labels:
History and Politics
June 11, 2010
Empowering the UN vs. Israel?
I confess, this gets under my skin. In ideal circumstances, the UN would strictly be an organization that provides a forum for international dialogue and diplomacy. Instead, it is treated too often as an unelected higher authority to which all nations should be subjugated. I tend to live in the camp that the UN should not trump any national interests, and that the UN should not have any authority in policing its member states. There are pros and cons to this, of course, but simply put, I believe the UN itself should not have any legal or judicial authority to prosecute nations or individuals in civil, legal or military matters. To allow such power to reside in the UN is to surrender sovereignty.
In the most general sense, the president should be a defender of America and her allies. Despite numerous differences in opinion with regard to policy, I will support a president who seeks to represent the American ideals of freedom and liberty to the world. But I'm finding it difficult to stomach the continuing turn against Israel this administration appears to be taking (emphasis mine):
The world is indeed going mad ... and so, apparently, are we.
Update 4:17pm: According to the Jerusalem Post, the administration is denying any intent to support a UN investigation into Israel's role in the flotilla incident. We'll have to wait and see what actually happens. Here's hoping the original Weekly Standard report isn't accurate.
In the most general sense, the president should be a defender of America and her allies. Despite numerous differences in opinion with regard to policy, I will support a president who seeks to represent the American ideals of freedom and liberty to the world. But I'm finding it difficult to stomach the continuing turn against Israel this administration appears to be taking (emphasis mine):
THE WEEKLY STANDARD has learned that senior Obama administration officials have been telling foreign governments that the administration intends to support an effort next week at the United Nations to set up an independent commission, under UN auspices, to investigate Israel's behavior in the Gaza flotilla incident. The White House has apparently shrugged off concerns from elsewhere in the U.S. government that a) this is an extraordinary singling out of Israel, since all kinds of much worse incidents happen around the world without spurring UN investigations; b) that the investigation will be one-sided, focusing entirely on Israeli behavior and not on Turkey or on Hamas; and c) that this sets a terrible precedent for outside investigations of incidents involving U.S. troops or intelligence operatives as we conduct our own war on terror.Why on earth are we turning against such a key ally? How does such a step possibly benefit the security interests of America and the Mideast? Is the administration simply trying to curry favor with "the world"?
The world is indeed going mad ... and so, apparently, are we.
Update 4:17pm: According to the Jerusalem Post, the administration is denying any intent to support a UN investigation into Israel's role in the flotilla incident. We'll have to wait and see what actually happens. Here's hoping the original Weekly Standard report isn't accurate.
Labels:
History and Politics
June 07, 2010
Something Lighter - After LOST
If you were not an avid fan of ABC's Lost, this post will probably not make any sense to you. But those of you who did watch Lost, perhaps you can identify.
Things I've discovered or done since Lost ended two weeks ago:
Sigh. Time to "move on." But it was fun. What a great, deeply thought provoking show.
Things I've discovered or done since Lost ended two weeks ago:
1. Children? I have children?In closing, in honor of the contributions of the Dharma Initiative to the island mystery, a closing video from the Hanso Foundation, courtesy Jimmy Kimmel Live:
2. Vacuumed 500 square feet of months-old sawdust. (really)
3. Primed 48 (blankety-blank) bookshelves. (really - I have the back trauma to prove it!)
4. Attended 4 baseball games in stifling heat and the threat of storms.
5. Watched it rain 8 or 9 inches (had to be).
6. Thanks to all the rain, mowed the yard 27 times. (minor exaggeration)
7. Realized that Star Trek:TNG is sooo 1980's. It was even 80's during the 90's.
8. Checked EW.com and Doc Jensen's Twitter page twice a day out of habit.
9. Rewatched the Lost finale with those useless pop-up notes from ABC, that only seem to say the utterly obvious.
10. Resisted the urge to run out the back porch screaming "WAAALLLLLTTTTT!!!!"
Sigh. Time to "move on." But it was fun. What a great, deeply thought provoking show.
Labels:
Just for Fun
Mideast Watch
It was bad enough that the government of Turkey sanctioned the attempt by so-called peace activists to run an Israeli military blockade of Gaza. This blockade, which even analysts for Reuters recognize as legal per international law, aims to stem the flow of non-humanitarian shipments into Gaza-direct. Legitimate humanitarian resources are readily allowed into Gaza, once inspected by Israeli officials. Remember, the blockade is in place because Hamas controls Gaza, and they like to shoot rockets from Gaza into Israel indiscriminately.
But the attempts to run the blockade have everything to do with political media show, and little to do with true humanitarian cause. The leadership of Turkey is flexing its muscle in the region, to the point where now the Turkish prime minister Erdogan is considering sending future flotillas against the blockade accompanied by the Turkish navy. He is even considering personally making the journey to Gaza to help break the blockade. To make matters worse, Iran also wants to play. They plan to send ships too. Turkish and Iranian ships against an Israeli blockade. I sure do hope the State Department is in overdrive here, even if behind the scenes.
I've quoted Professor Paul Rahe of Hillsdale College before. In a article for BigGovernment.com, he writes (emphasis mine):
Little good can come from the standoff of Israeli, Turkish and Iranian naval vessels in close proximity. We shall see.
But the attempts to run the blockade have everything to do with political media show, and little to do with true humanitarian cause. The leadership of Turkey is flexing its muscle in the region, to the point where now the Turkish prime minister Erdogan is considering sending future flotillas against the blockade accompanied by the Turkish navy. He is even considering personally making the journey to Gaza to help break the blockade. To make matters worse, Iran also wants to play. They plan to send ships too. Turkish and Iranian ships against an Israeli blockade. I sure do hope the State Department is in overdrive here, even if behind the scenes.
I've quoted Professor Paul Rahe of Hillsdale College before. In a article for BigGovernment.com, he writes (emphasis mine):
There were six ships in the Gaza Flotilla. Only one of them was the source of any trouble, and it was a Turkish craft to a considerable degree manned by Turks. That Hamas and its allies should have staged such an incident is only what we should expect. That the Turkish government should have a hand in such a matter, as it evidently did – that is disturbing in the extreme.Turkey is a member of NATO, which complicates matters significantly. The apparent trajectories of Turkey and Egypt, once able partners with the U.S. in general support of Israel's right to exist, is a troubling development. I will not go as far as Professor Rahe does in criticizing the White House, but it is troubling that they seem to have little to say publicly. Nevertheless, I would rather them exercise some caution, given that Turkey and Israel, though now apparently at odds with one another, are both still allies of the U.S. But if Turkey does indeed decide to cast its lot with Iran, Syria and terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah, we should be very, very concerned.
If Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan succeeds in his quest, there will be a major change in the balance of power in the Middle East. These days, apart from the Islamic Republic of Iran and its ally Syria, there is no state of any real significance in the Middle East that sponsors terrorism. But Turkey now appears to be coming down on the side of Hamas and Hezbollah, and that really matters. Turkey is a regional power of no mean importance. It has a first-rate army and a fine military tradition; and, when Turks throw themselves into a fight, they mean business. Turkey has weight.
Meanwhile, in Egypt, an epoch is about to come to an end. Soon, Hosni Mubarak, who has ruled Egypt for nearly thirty years, will pass from the scene. I would not be surprised if his successor, responding to the impulses felt by the younger generation, were to ally himself with the Muslim Brotherhood. There is a storm gathering in the Middle East, and at the White House, alas, it is amateur hour, for the United States now has a President who appears to be blithely unaware of the consequences – or worse: unconcerned or even vaguely sympathetic to the transformation about to take place.
Little good can come from the standoff of Israeli, Turkish and Iranian naval vessels in close proximity. We shall see.
Labels:
History and Politics
June 02, 2010
Anxious Thoughts on Israel
When I was in high school, I had to do a current events project for my American Government class. I was not the news junkie then that I am today, and my understanding of the world and its politics was woefully uninformed. I went to the library and grabbed a newspaper article on whatever constituted the "Middle East peace process" of the late 80's. Based on this single reference, I produced a poster that rather poorly depicted the United States as pouring gasoline on the Israeli-PLO conflict, while holding back the "water" that would bring peace. As I recall, my mother later told me that she had to remove the poster from the table where I had been working on it, as it highly upset my father.
I'm reminded of that episode, not because it has anything to do with any differences between my politics and that of my father. No, I'm reminded of my own ignorance, as I watch the latest crisis surrounding Israel taking shape. The news has been filled in recent days of the attempt by a Turkish flotilla loaded with supplies and "activists" to run a naval blockade Israel has imposed on Gaza. There are options for getting humanitarian supplies to Gaza, which go through various checkpoints for inspection. The blockade exists to ensure that ONLY humanitarian supplies get to the people who live under control of Hamas, an organization designated as terrorist by the U.S. Bottom line, these Turkish "activists" attempted to run a military blockade. At least 10 paid the price.
Israel has long been a strong U.S. ally. But the signs are everywhere that this alliance is weakening, as the political holy grail of Mideast peace beckons. The U.S. signed onto a U.N. resolution that singles out Israel negatively, in the interest of a nuclear free region (while nothing substantive is said about Iran's progress toward becoming a nuclear nation). Further, the administration appears not to be defending the legitimacy of the blockade, and is being condemned by the State Department. Not to mention the audacity of the U.S. government trying to tell a sovereign nation where it can and cannot build apartment complexes.
I find it rather illuminating that the so-called peace "activists" were armed, and several appear to have direct ties to jihadist organizations. Nevertheless, it appears that none will be prosecuted, but rather will be deported and otherwise released.
Israel is in a constant state of conflict and isolation. Yet this time, I feel a sense of foreboding. There's the flotilla incident; Lebanon tried to shoot down an Israeli plane; Iran keeps rattling the saber as it flaunts the world in its pursuit of nuclear weapon technology; and a less friendly posture between Israel and the U.S. Beyond the strategic value of the relationship in a volatile region, there is a very real connection between Israel and America that goes beyond geopolitics. No doubt, America has its Jew-haters. But we do share a common spiritual heritage, albeit with one major distinction and chasm. In all of this, I cannot help but to think that there is great danger in turning our backs against Israel. With so much of the world turning up its condemnation of Israel, I can foresee a worst-case scenario that places us on the sidelines watching a Euro-Arab-Persian perpetration of a second Holocaust.
I can only pray that these straits are not so dire. Yet then I read an account of an American rabbi in Israel, who sometimes blogs at Sense of Events. He writes of life as a parent in what is presumed to become a new theater of war. I find myself deeply moved by this inside sense of things, apart from the news media. My take is this: unless the winds shift soon, a major Mideast war is at hand. And what awaits us if that happens?
My late grandfather had quite the interest in end-times prophecies. The last time I saw him, many years ago, he pulled me aside and looked me directly in the eye, earnestly saying: "Jesus is coming back soon. He's coming. It will happen in your lifetime." I simply and warmly responded, "I know, Grandpa."
From a theology standpoint, I tend to be very much in the realm that we can know neither the day nor the hour of the Lord's return. Signs of the end times have been prevalent since His Ascension. I would prefer to focus my energies not on what may or may not be signs pointing to the fulfillment of prophecy, but rather on the ministry of today, and the impact that today can have on eternity.
Yet a part of me does wonder, and what I see unfolding reminds me of how temporary this all is. The last 20 years have been distinctly tumultuous. I'm afraid we haven't seen anything yet.
Perhaps Grandpa was onto something.
I'm reminded of that episode, not because it has anything to do with any differences between my politics and that of my father. No, I'm reminded of my own ignorance, as I watch the latest crisis surrounding Israel taking shape. The news has been filled in recent days of the attempt by a Turkish flotilla loaded with supplies and "activists" to run a naval blockade Israel has imposed on Gaza. There are options for getting humanitarian supplies to Gaza, which go through various checkpoints for inspection. The blockade exists to ensure that ONLY humanitarian supplies get to the people who live under control of Hamas, an organization designated as terrorist by the U.S. Bottom line, these Turkish "activists" attempted to run a military blockade. At least 10 paid the price.
Israel has long been a strong U.S. ally. But the signs are everywhere that this alliance is weakening, as the political holy grail of Mideast peace beckons. The U.S. signed onto a U.N. resolution that singles out Israel negatively, in the interest of a nuclear free region (while nothing substantive is said about Iran's progress toward becoming a nuclear nation). Further, the administration appears not to be defending the legitimacy of the blockade, and is being condemned by the State Department. Not to mention the audacity of the U.S. government trying to tell a sovereign nation where it can and cannot build apartment complexes.
I find it rather illuminating that the so-called peace "activists" were armed, and several appear to have direct ties to jihadist organizations. Nevertheless, it appears that none will be prosecuted, but rather will be deported and otherwise released.
Israel is in a constant state of conflict and isolation. Yet this time, I feel a sense of foreboding. There's the flotilla incident; Lebanon tried to shoot down an Israeli plane; Iran keeps rattling the saber as it flaunts the world in its pursuit of nuclear weapon technology; and a less friendly posture between Israel and the U.S. Beyond the strategic value of the relationship in a volatile region, there is a very real connection between Israel and America that goes beyond geopolitics. No doubt, America has its Jew-haters. But we do share a common spiritual heritage, albeit with one major distinction and chasm. In all of this, I cannot help but to think that there is great danger in turning our backs against Israel. With so much of the world turning up its condemnation of Israel, I can foresee a worst-case scenario that places us on the sidelines watching a Euro-Arab-Persian perpetration of a second Holocaust.
I can only pray that these straits are not so dire. Yet then I read an account of an American rabbi in Israel, who sometimes blogs at Sense of Events. He writes of life as a parent in what is presumed to become a new theater of war. I find myself deeply moved by this inside sense of things, apart from the news media. My take is this: unless the winds shift soon, a major Mideast war is at hand. And what awaits us if that happens?
My late grandfather had quite the interest in end-times prophecies. The last time I saw him, many years ago, he pulled me aside and looked me directly in the eye, earnestly saying: "Jesus is coming back soon. He's coming. It will happen in your lifetime." I simply and warmly responded, "I know, Grandpa."
From a theology standpoint, I tend to be very much in the realm that we can know neither the day nor the hour of the Lord's return. Signs of the end times have been prevalent since His Ascension. I would prefer to focus my energies not on what may or may not be signs pointing to the fulfillment of prophecy, but rather on the ministry of today, and the impact that today can have on eternity.
Yet a part of me does wonder, and what I see unfolding reminds me of how temporary this all is. The last 20 years have been distinctly tumultuous. I'm afraid we haven't seen anything yet.
Perhaps Grandpa was onto something.
Labels:
History and Politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)